JimN wrote:The sovereign test of the quality of a melody (and its underlying harmonic structure) is whether it could be performed as a valid and engaging instrumental.
I quite agree. Relying on lyrics to get your own personal meaning from a song as a listener is shallow, IMO.
I almost never hear the lyrics of a song unless they're appalling or exceptional. I usually just let the melody, harmony, chord sequence and arrangement wash over me. A bad habit, some might say, borne of listening to instrumental music for so long. I must admit to enjoying many of the Shads' covers of the seventies and eighties, but that's probably more of a personal nostalgia thing (I knew tracks such as
Memory and
If You Leave Me Now at an early age, long before I'd discovered the group's original hits and "That Sound").
Ding-a-Dong is actually pretty good, musically. Jim's right, it's a better melody than
Let Me Be the One, although it has poorer lyrics. The lyrics and the song title are what let it down. But if it was specially written for Eurovision then it was a song designed to win the votes of millions of people of many different languages. Though the result sounds twee to us, using onomatopoeia was a good, if cheap, way of ensuring that.
A good arrangement can cover a multitude of sins, though, and make a bad song sound pleasant. The art of song-writing died a long time ago and a business of the same name took over. Advanced production techniques meant song-writers became increasingly lazy (why else would Hank have such trouble deciding on the track list for an album of covers, such as he did with "Guitar Man"? I mean, James Blunt's
You're Beautiful? Ouch. Bloody record labels.).
If I consciously enjoy both lyrics and melody together on first hearing it's safe to say that the composer (and lyricist, if applicable) has done his job properly. Very rarely does it happen.
J