by hubcaps » 06 Jul 2012, 15:55
[quote="JimN] I still believe that the correct meaning of "cover" is overlooked. It does not mean playing [i]Apache at a Shadows club. It means issuing a quick copy recording to try to cash in. In the 1850s (er... make that the 1950s), it wasn't even uncommon for the same song to be in the charts in three different versions (this before the industry had ceased to regard a new pop song as the property of everyone - including the vocalists with numerous Palais bands up and down the country).
I have both versions of [i]Bobby's Girl and I'm inclined to agree with you that the UK version is better than the original. Similar things can be said about The Beatles' [i]Twist And Shout and the Swinging Blue Jeans' Hippy Hippy Shake. Both records are era-defining tour-de-force performances (though I am sure that the SBJ's record features at least one session-man), whereas the Isley Brothers and Chan Romero originals .........JN[/quote][/i][/i][/i]
I agree with your definition of a "cover" version - in the days of racially segregated music in the USA, if a song rose up the "Race" or "R&B" charts then usually a white singer or group would quickly record a version to challenge the main (white) charts. Tragic examples of this are Pat Boone's limp versions of Little Richard's Tutti Frutti and Long Tall Sally in 1956/7.
By the way, the original recording of Twst And Shout was in 1961 by a group called the Top Notes - it's on YouTube
I'm out with my band tonight and will include our versions (NOT covers) of Flingel Bunt, Apache, FBI and Albatross !
Ian