drakula63 wrote:Assuming that BBC4 are now gearing up for Top of the Pops 1979, it can't be long now until we see the Shads and their TOTP appearances for Don't Cry For Me Argentina and Cavatina. Whilst I realise that the BBC are now reluctant to broadcast editions that are presented by Jimmy Savile and DL-T, wouldn't it be better to just edit these presenters out of the programmes in question rather than pulling them from the schedule all together?
Dave Lee Travis is facing charges that have not been tested in a court of law and he has pleaded not guilty. He must be presumed innocent unless found guilty. It would be inappropriate to edit in a way that assumed a guilty verdict; to be known to be doing so while the case was active could amount to contempt of court.
As to Jimmy Savile, the work involved in editing a programme to remove his links, and then finding other material to bulk it out to fill its time slot, would cost people's time and facilities. That would be more expensive than simply not running the programme. You'd have to ask how good a use of your Licence Fee such editing was.
drakula63 wrote:I note that, apparently, the current Christmas Number One has sold about 149,000 copies. This just shows how meaningless today's singles charts are as this number of sales probably wouldn't have even got you in the top 50 in 1979. Having said that, does anyone know how many copies the aforementioned Shads classics sold...?
I have no idea how many copies
Cavatina or
Argentina sold, but of course chart position reflects rate of sale relative to other records at the time, not total volume over a period.
For example, one bit of anecdotal research tells me that George Michael's 1984 single
Last Christmas sold half a million copies in the first week of release but reached only number two because Band Aid was selling even faster. If Band Aid hadn't been around, it would have been number one.
Another piece says The Beatles' 1963 single
She Loves You was on the charts for 29 weeks and sold 1.89 million copies. On average that would be about 65,000 copies in each of those weeks - although obviously the chart-topping weeks would reflect higher figures. Nevertheless, you could guess that 100,000 copies a week would have meant a healthy chart position in those days.
In that context, sales today of 149,000 in one week would be stunning. That figure spread over 4 weeks would still be pretty good.
Don't know if any of that helps!
Iain