Hanks wireless system

The Shadows, their music, their members and Shadows-related activity by former members of this community

Hanks wireless system

Postby Apache1 » 24 Jul 2010, 11:24


Does anyone know which wireless system Hank used on the 50th Anniversary tour ?
he certainly did not use the Samon which he used on the 2004 Shadows Final tour.
John
Apache1
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby Apache1 » 24 Jul 2010, 13:21

Sorry about the typo "Samson"
Apache1
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby s4wgb » 24 Jul 2010, 14:56

.
Last edited by s4wgb on 29 Apr 2011, 12:19, edited 1 time in total.
s4wgb
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby John M » 24 Jul 2010, 15:19

And if memory serves me well, the receiver unit is about £2,500
John M
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby JimN » 24 Jul 2010, 16:59

John M wrote:And if memory serves me well, the receiver unit is about £2,500


<wince>

You can get a serviceable guitar lead for £15 and an excellent, state-of-the-art, one for about £75; better than any wireless system. Ask Justin...

JN
User avatar
JimN
 
Posts: 4559
Joined: 17 Sep 2009, 23:39

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby rogera » 24 Jul 2010, 18:37

Regarding guitar leads, think carefully before paying a lot of money for an expensive 'state of the art' one if you are seeking to recreate the early Shadows sound.

In those days guitar leads never came in different qualities and those that were used on stage were usually quite long.
User avatar
rogera
 
Posts: 1054
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 13:06
Location: South West

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby Apache1 » 24 Jul 2010, 22:45

Thanks everyone for your replys and information, Shure - trust Hank to have the best
John
Apache1
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby John M » 24 Jul 2010, 23:31

Re. the Samsons. Ive been using one for a few years now, as has our rhythm guitarist, and although Samson claim the units deliver good sound, there is one annoying foible.
At first I thought it was just me, then perhaps my unit has a fault of some description, but only within the last few days Ive discovered it seems to be a "built in" problem.
If you hit a solo note the sound appears to "swoop in" almost like a fast acting volume pedal. It also makes the G string notes sound somewhat shallow (both wound and plain strings) And Ive noticed it on the Shadows final tour DVD where Samsons are being used.

The very first note in Theme for Young Lovers shows this effect very well. There are other points during the disc but that one is the most obvious and most easily heard.
Im surprised that Hank didnt notice this as they must have used this setup during rehearsals, but maybe they were committed to using them.
At around £200 when the show was recorded they must have been relatively expensive, but now around the £150 mark, and if you can put up with the "swoop" Maplins are selling the Samsons under their own brand name for £79.
The £2000+ units would be built to a higher (hopefully) standard :)

Perhaps some of the more technically minded members can put forward a theory for this effect... I personally think there is some "companding" going on to maintain S/N ratios .. a bit like Dolby processing, but have yet to find any details in print which give an answer.
John M
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby cockroach » 25 Jul 2010, 02:47

Didn't Bo Winberg build a wireless system for the Spotnicks about 50 years ago? ;)

When I saw the Shadows here in Australia in the '80's, Bruce's wireless unit packed up on stage and he swapped over to a normal lead....

Last year at a theatre concert, right on the first notes of our opening tune (Apache!) our lead player's wireless unit broke down, along with the wiring of his custom shop Strat AND his Amtech echo unit also malfunctioned - luckily his Vox amp was working -although it had played up at rehearsals a couple of nights before......so instead of playing rhythm, I took over and played most of the tunes in the set myself with the drummer and bass player until the lead player could sort his gear out!

Forget wireless, keep to a simple signal path!
cockroach
 

Re: Hanks wireless system

Postby Santoinetwo » 26 Jul 2010, 20:36

Well seems nobody likes the wireless systems huh ! I have to say that I got fed up of trying to avoid my own lead on stage, and indeed my fellow guitarists lead. Tripping over leads onstage is not only dangerous but dam un cool ! I just wonder how many of you, have had the misfortune of setting up there gear and then touching the mike, only to receive a belt of 240 v because the venues earth is faulty. On safety alone that's one good reason to use wireless. I also love to mix with the crowds at gigs, Long lead? No I don't think so !! A good quality lead for recording is of course essential, and I have no problem with that. Live work for me is wireless, for freedom and safety. Some people say your guitar tone can be effected by wireless, and I'm sure there is some truth in that. Though nothing that couldn't be corrected on ones amp/rack I have graphic equalizer within my rack, but cannot remember the last time I needed to switch it inline.
User avatar
Santoinetwo
 
Posts: 26
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 13:45

Next

Return to The Main Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.