Fenderman wrote:That's an interesting statement and i have noticed there hasn't been much talk on here since its release (there's quite a bit on the Facebook Shadows page).
I played it this morning once, i'll need a few more listens before i can get into it. Regarding Pepper, i won't be buying it as i can't afford the £100+ for the set and it was mixed in 1967 the way the Beatles intended it to sound, why tinker with 50 year old masters? Although the outtakes may be of interest.
MartcasterJunior wrote:Well, all I can say is, if you've not listened to the Sgt Pepper box set (the remix is OK but the bonus tracks are more of a draw), then you're missing a treat. It's getting more plays in this house than Without A Word ever will (of which no track has managed to last the full running time yet).
I think it says a lot about Without A Word that, even on a Shadows appreciation forum, a thread about its release garners more comments about the rerelease of a 50-year-old album by a different artist...but I'll leave my negativity there!
Matt
MartcasterJunior wrote:Well, all I can say is, if you've not listened to the Sgt Pepper box set (the remix is OK but the bonus tracks are more of a draw), then you're missing a treat. It's getting more plays in this house than Without A Word ever will (of which no track has managed to last the full running time yet).
I think it says a lot about Without A Word that, even on a Shadows appreciation forum, a thread about its release garners more comments about the rerelease of a 50-year-old album by a different artist...but I'll leave my negativity there!
Matt
Uncleboko wrote:Downloading super deluxe version in FLAC now - for nothing!!!
It sounds fabulous!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests