Iain Purdon wrote:drakula63 wrote:anyone using Bruce's book as their reference would, from these passages, conclude that the band had continued without him
If you look at that book in isolation, you certainly could conclude that the band had gone on. However, it's a book about Bruce Welch's life and takes his perspective. If you talk to Hank Marvin and Brian Bennett, as Mike Read did, it becomes very clear that The Shadows as a full-time enterprise did stop at that point and that anything done afterwards was a gig, not part of a continuing commitment.
And it therefore makes
total sense for Hank to present Bruce with an engraved clock in recognition of his services.
I would hate for you to agree with me, Iain, on anything!
It reminds me of something that happened to a friend of mine, who was a guitarist in a band. One day it was decided by the rest of the band that they were going to 'split up'. All bands come to an end, so fair enough.
About two weeks later my friend wandered into a pub and what do you think he found? That's right, the self-same band, still with the same name, doing a gig... with a new guitarist! And this, I can assure you, is a true story.
No direct comparisons are intended. However... it seems that different people see the 'break up' of the Shadows in different ways and I for one don't see an end to things until 1970/1971 and the advent of Marvin, Welch and Farrar.
And to get us back on track...
I see from the Alan Jones interview in Pipeline 67, that he states that he played bass for Marvin, Welch and Farrar for a couple of weeks during their live shows. I'll admit that I had never heard this before. I am guessing that this must have been 1970 or '71. He also makes reference to George Ford standing in for him a couple of times when he wasn't available, which does suggest that the gig, otherwise, would have been his. In terms of 'listenability' - if that makes sense - I'd place Alan Jones up there with John Rostill and easily on a par with Alan Tarney.