by geoff1711 » 19 Dec 2012, 09:56
I have to agree with Dave here, I was 14 when Apache came out and they were my no1 band but the vocals?????
In interviews either Hank or Bruce said they were influenced by the Everley Bros but at that time the lyrics, harmonies and voice tone was more Mickey and Grif than Don and Phil.
That's not to say that 50 years on and older than my parents were at the time they're not pleasant enough, but for a rebelious teenager ( I had cowhorn handlebars and the saddle pointing upward on my bike - remember that!!) they just sounded too goody goody.
In fact by the time most of these vocals were around I was more into The Stones, Who, Animals, and then prog rock. I'd left the likes of The Shads, Ventures, Duanne Eddy far behind and didn't re-aquire a taste for instrumental music until somebody bought me a ticket for one of Hank's solo tours in th early 90's, although I did still play Apache at home as a warm up.
As for now, I still don't know what it is about them, the vocals, harmonies, pitch are all good but they still sound a bit twee, which is odd, because when you hear Hank or Bruce singing other peoples rock and roll they sound fine and Hank and / or Bruces songs recorded by others sound good as well.
Geoff