The Shadows: The Collection

The Shadows, their music, their members and Shadows-related activity by former members of this community

The Shadows: The Collection

Postby drakula63 » 02 Aug 2013, 11:03

An interesting departure from the usual order of things...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Collection- ... l_1#disc_1

...Mind you, they really should have put a Burns Marvin or the black Strat on the cover!!! Nice pic though!
User avatar
drakula63
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 20:05
Location: U.K.

Re: The Shadows: The Collection

Postby JimN » 02 Aug 2013, 15:07

A thirty-four track Shadows "punters" collection with nothing from before early 1967?

That is unusual.
User avatar
JimN
 
Posts: 4559
Joined: 17 Sep 2009, 23:39

Re: The Shadows: The Collection

Postby George Geddes » 03 Aug 2013, 09:55

Looks like a 'Moonlight Shadows' type selection of covers for the most part, which makes the inclusion of the vocals somewhat odd.

George
George Geddes
 
Posts: 1440
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 21:18
Location: Glasgow

Re: The Shadows: The Collection

Postby nivram106 » 03 Aug 2013, 12:15

According to Amazon the release date has now been put back to August 26th, no sign of it on Leo's Den as yet.

Jim :shock:
nivram106
 

Re: The Shadows: The Collection

Postby nivram106 » 26 Aug 2013, 17:35

Released today :D :D :D
nivram106
 

Re: The Shadows: The Collection

Postby drakula63 » 28 Aug 2013, 12:31

Was perusing the 'easy listening' shelf of the Nottingham HMV yesterday, just before closing time, and the aforementioned album leapt out at me! They had four copies, they now have three. Listened to CD1 last night and, of course, enjoyed it. I never tire of hearing these tunes/songs and without using the shuffle function on my CD player this is as good a way as any to hear them in a different order to what I'm used to!

Interesting that the recordings are now all owned by Parlophone as oposed to EMI or Columbia. The result of cost-cutting at the parent company I imagine?

Also very sad to see that The Shadows (along with Cliff) are now considered 'easy listening' whereas Elvis is still 'pop and rock'. I find it mildly insulting for the band that inspired, amongst MANY others, Tony Iommi, George Harrison, Brian May and Neil Young. I wonder of a letter-writing or emailing campaign would succeed in getting at least the Shads returned to their rightful place...???
User avatar
drakula63
 
Posts: 2631
Joined: 16 Sep 2009, 20:05
Location: U.K.


Return to The Main Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.