Cliff Richard v Elvis

The Shadows, their music, their members and Shadows-related activity by former members of this community

Cliff Richard v Elvis

Postby Billyboygretsch » 21 May 2014, 17:05

Would Elvis have benefitted from having an instrumental backing band as did Cliif. Perhaps The Ventures !
I liked Scotty Moore but he was never really allowed to perform in his own right or take some limelight. I think the Shadows enjoyed a high profile which undoubtedly with their talent helped them with their success.
Elvis in the Sun days was refreshing and inspiring. If Scotty and the band had developed we might be including them with the Shadows v Ventures comparisons
Billyboygretsch
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: 14 Nov 2012, 21:15
Location: Bedfordshire

Re: Cliff Richard v Elvis

Postby Stratpicker » 21 May 2014, 17:17

No, his Ego was far too big for that!
Ian
Stratpicker
 
Posts: 1772
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 16:24
Location: Wolverhampton UK

Re: Cliff Richard v Elvis

Postby ecca » 21 May 2014, 19:18

I think it was more the Colonel than Elvis that pulled the strings.
ecca
 

Re: Cliff Richard v Elvis

Postby Didier » 21 May 2014, 20:11

ecca wrote:I think it was more the Colonel than Elvis that pulled the strings.

It certainly was the case, when Elvis came back from the military service, "Colonel" Parker decided to drop Elvis' rock sound with Scotty Moore to make him record with large bands to appeal to a larger audience. It didn't work for me, I was highly disappointed with the "Elvis is back" album, and stopped buying Elvis' records...

Didier
User avatar
Didier
 
Posts: 1934
Joined: 15 Sep 2009, 10:57
Location: West suburb of Paris, France

Re: Cliff Richard v Elvis

Postby kipper » 21 May 2014, 23:04

Didier wrote:
ecca wrote:I think it was more the Colonel than Elvis that pulled the strings.

It certainly was the case, when Elvis came back from the military service, "Colonel" Parker decided to drop Elvis' rock sound with Scotty Moore to make him record with large bands to appeal to a larger audience. It didn't work for me, I was highly disappointed with the "Elvis is back" album, and stopped buying Elvis' records...

Didier

i agree with ecca and didier parker mishandled elvis the guy had so much talent, with a decent manager he would have got involved with far better stuff than he did. but then again the shadows were led down the wrong path in my opinion, they were taken down the cabaret circuit far to early in there careers they should have hung on to the rock roll longer. peter
kipper
 

Re: Cliff Richard v Elvis

Postby Billyboygretsch » 21 May 2014, 23:18

I suppose at the time with the film industry growing pop stars would be big attractions. At least the Shadows were involved in the plot and were part of the action as it were and we got some good memories and fine performance like the Savage. Poor old Scotty ,Bill and DJ were completely side lined. Hey ho that's life
Billyboygretsch
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: 14 Nov 2012, 21:15
Location: Bedfordshire


Return to The Main Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

Ads by Google
These advertisements are selected and placed by Google to assist with the cost of site maintenance.
ShadowMusic is not responsible for the content of external advertisements.


cron